The Effect of Auditory Distraction and Working Memory on Iranian EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Languages and Literature, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Perceiving the spoken language, as a key challenge in acquiring a second language, is affected by numerous variables. The current study aimed to explore the impacts of auditory distraction and working memory on the Iranian (EFL) learners’ listening comprehension. It further explored the effects of different item types (content, integrated, and inferential) and their interactions with working memory on listening comprehension under adverse conditions. To achieve these objectives, a convenient sample of 54 advanced language learners was selected via a listening placement from a TOEFL test. Their working memory capacity (high/low span) was measured using Daneman and Carpenter’s (1980) reading span test. The participants took part in a listening task under both adverse (with auditory distraction from babble noise) and normal conditions. The results revealed the significant and negative impact of auditory distraction on listening comprehension. Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed for the working memory and item type effects. These findings contribute to our understanding of the intricate relationship between auditory distractions, working memory, and listening comprehension among Iranian EFL learners.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alain, C., Quan, J., McDonald, K. & Van Roon, P. (2009). Noise‐induced increase in human auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(1), 132-142.
Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., Van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R. & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non‐native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49-78.
Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B. & Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller, M. (2009). The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 371-384.
Asher, J. (2000). Learning Another Language Through Actions. Sky Oaks Productions.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S. & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43(1), 12-29.
Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2010). Working memory and executive control: A time-based resource-sharing account. Psychologica Belgica, 50(3), 353-382.
Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S. & Camos, V. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118(2), 175.
Beaman, C. P. (2004). The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 1106.
Colflesh, G. J. & Conway, A. R. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 699-703.
Cooke, M., Garcia Lecumberri, M. L. & Barker, J. (2008). The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 414-427.
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466.
Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422-433.
Elliott, E. M. & Briganti, A. M. (2012). Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect. Acta Psychologica, 140(1), 64-74.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E. & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309.
Francart, T., Van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. (2011). Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests. International Journal of Audiology, 50(1), 2-13.
Jones, D. M. & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 369.
Jones, D. & Morris, N. (1992). Irrelevant speech and serial recall: Implications for theories of attention and working memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33(3), 212-229.
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W. & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189.
Krashen, S. D., Terrell, T. D., Ehrman, M. E. & Herzog, M. (1984). A theoretical basis for teaching the receptive skills. Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 261.
Lecumberri, M. L. & Cooke, M. (2006). Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2445-2454.
Lynch, T. & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Schmitt, N. & Rodgers, M. P. (Eds.). London: Arnold.
Masrai, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(3), 423-447.   
Namaziandost, E., Hafezian, M. & Shafiee, S. (2018). Exploring the association among working memory, anxiety and Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1-17.
Nagaraj, N. K. (2021). Effect of auditory distraction on working memory, attention switching, and listening comprehension. Audiology Research, 11(2), 227-243.
Nagaraj, N. K., Magimairaj, B. M. & Schwartz, S. (2020). Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3581-3593.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U. & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
Oswald, C. J., Tremblay, S. & Jones, D. M. (2000). Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory, 8(5), 345-350.
Ries, D. T. (2007). The influence of noise type and level upon stochastic resonance in human audition. Hearing Research, 228(1-2), 136-143.
Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., ... & Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31.
Salame, P. & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 150-164.
Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. & Best, V. (2008). Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends in Amplification, 12(4), 283-299.
Sörqvist, P. (2010). The role of working memory capacity in auditory distraction: A review. Noise and Health, 12(49), 217.
Sörqvist, P., Marsh, J. E. & Nöstl, A. (2013). High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 897-904.
Treiman, R., Clifton Jr, C., Meyer, A. S. & Wurm, L. H. (2003). Psycholinguistics: Language comprehension and production. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, 4, 527-548.
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M. & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635-654.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). 1. Listening to learn or learning to listen?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6-18.
Vandergrift, L. & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390-416.
Winitz, H. (1981). Input considerations in the comprehension of first and second language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 296-308
Yang, X., Jiang, M. & Zhao, Y. (2017). Effects of noise on English listening comprehension among Chinese college students with different learning styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1764.
Journal of Studies in Language Learning and Teaching
Volume 1, Issue 2
July 2024
Pages 379-393

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 March 2024
  • Revise Date: 17 October 2024
  • Accept Date: 19 October 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics