Reviewers

Reviewers

REVIEWERS PAGE

Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, JSLLT's Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. JSLT adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid and fair, and also ensures a high quality of articles published. In so doing, JSLLT needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts with a turn around time of about 4 weeks. Maintaining JSLLT as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.

REVIEWERS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

(http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Peer%20review%20guidelines.pdf)

If JSLLT's Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:

  1. Reviewing manuscript critically but constructively and preparing detailed comments about the manuscript to help authors improve their work
  2. Reviewing multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary
  3. Providing all required information within established deadlines
  4. Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal
  5. Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript they are asked to review
  6. Reporting possible research misconducts
  7. Suggesting alternative reviewers in case they cannot review the manuscript for any reasons
  8. Treating the manuscript as a confidential document
  9. Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript
  10. Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow they identify the authors
  11. Not identifying themselves to authors
  12. Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer
  13. Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work
  14. Informing the editor if he/she finds the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to his/her knowledge
  15. Writing review report in English only

WHAT SHOULD BE CHECKED WHILE REVIEWING A MANUSCRIPT?

  1. Novelty
  2. Originality
  3. Scientific reliability
  4. Valuable contribution to the science
  5. Adding new aspects to the existed field of study
  6. Ethical aspects
  7. Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines
  8. References provided to substantiate the content
  9. Grammar, punctuation and spelling
  10. Scientific misconduct

Reviewer Name

Affiliation

Gholam-Reza Abbasian

English Department, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran

Alireza Ahmadi

Shiraz University

Maryam Alavi Nia

University of New South Wales

Minoo Alemi

Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch

Mohammad Aliakbari

Ilam University

Goudarz Alibakhshi

Allameh Tabataba'i university

Hamid Allami

Yazd University

Saeed Ameri

Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Sasan Baleghizadeh

Shahid Beheshti University

Elena Barcena

Departamento de Filologias Extranjeras Facultad de Filologia, UNED (Spain)

David Caldwell

University of South Australia

Alexanne Don

University of Birmingham, UK: English language and linguistics

Zohreh Eslami Rasekh

Professor of ESL Education/Reading, Texas A&M University, USA

Farzaneh Farahzad

Allameh Tabataba’i University

Mohammad Taghi Farvardin

Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch

Ali Mohammad Fazilatfar

English Dept., yazd University, Yazd IRAN

Azra Ghandeharion

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Department of English

Javad Gholami

Urmia University

Behzad Ghonsooly

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Zohreh G. Shooshtari

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Mahmood Hashemian

Shahrekord University

Mohsen Shirazizadeh

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University

Ahmad Izadi

University of Bayreuth

Ali Akbar Jafarpour Boroujeni

Shahrekord University

Alireza Jalilifar

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Amir Mashhadi

English Department, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Nadia Mayahi

Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Farhad Mazlum

Maragheh University

Mehdi Mehranirad

University of Neyshabur

Maryam Meshkat

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

Abdolmohammad Movahhed

Persian Gulf University

zohreh Nafissi

Dept. of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Languages, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

reza pishghadam

Department of English and Literature, Faculty of Letters and humanities, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Mehrak Rahimi

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

Naser Rashidi

Shiraz University

Kioumars Razavipur

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Seyyed Ayatollah Razmjoo

Shiraz University

Mohamad Reza Rezaeian Delouei

University of Birjand

Mohammad Javad Rezai

Yazd University

Mehdi Riazi

Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University

Ali Roohani

Shahrekord University

Mirzayi

Shahrekord University

Rahman Sahragard

Shiraz University

Hossein Shokouhi

Deakin University

Hassan Soodmand Afshar

Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan

Mohammad Hassan Tahririan

Sheikhbahaee University

Zia Tajeddin

Tarbiat Modares University

Elkhas Veysi

Payame Noor, Ahvaz

Pin Wang

Department of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiaotong University

Ali Akbar Jabbari

Yazd University

Manijeh Youhanaee

University of Isfahan

Golnar Mazdayasna

Yazd University

Seyedeh Elham Elhambakhsh

Yazd University

Forough Amirjalili

Yazd University

Fatemeh Mahdavirad

Yazd University

Farideh Pourgiv

Shiraz University

Reza Pishghadam

 

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

 

Mohammad Golshan

Islamic Azad University of Yazd (Meybod Branch)

Mehran Mohammadimoghadam

 

Yazd University

 

Najmeh Farshi

 

Yazd University

 

Mohammad Hasan Razmi

 

Yazd University