Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies as a Sequential Mediator Between Reading Self-Efficacy, Reading Enjoyment, and Reading Comprehension: A Serial Mediation Model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of English Language, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

Reading comprehension is an important skill for English as a foreign language (EFL) learners, but developing that skill requires elaborate methods and incorporates numerous levels of cognitive and affective influences. This study employs a novel SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) approach to examine how metacognitive awareness of reading strategies (MARS), reading self-efficacy (RSE), and reading enjoyment (RE) promote reading comprehension development for EFL students in Iran. Data were collected from a sample of 600 Iranian EFL learners with a quantitative design that relied on the MARS Inventory, RSE Questionnaire, RE Questionnaire, and a standardized Reading Comprehension Test. The data were recorded and analyzed with AMOS version 24 and MLE (Maximum Likelihood Estimation). Data showed that metacognitive awareness was a significant mediator in the effect of self-efficacy on reading comprehension, while enjoyment enacted changes in self-efficacy, and comprehension outcomes. Given the results, it was important to discuss the prominence of instilling metacognitive strategies and aspects of enjoyment in reading practice to influence reading comprehension in EFL educational settings. Regarding the implications for practical applications in the world of education, this research highlights key psychological pathways through which learners’ beliefs and emotions shape performance and suggest practical directions for designing strategy-based, enjoyment-enhancing reading instruction in similar EFL contexts.

Keywords

References

Alamer, A., & Alsagoafi, A. (2023). Construct validation of the revised Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI-R) and its relation to learning effort and reading achievement. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 125-149. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.31990
Al-khresheh, M. (2023). A mixed method study on the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies used by Saudi EFL students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202321535
Amini, D., Anhari, M. H., & Ghasemzadeh, A. (2020). Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self-regulation, and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1787018. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1787018
Arianto, F., & Hanif, M. (2024). Evaluating metacognitive strategies and self-regulated learning to predict primary school students’ self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in science learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202428575
Bagci, H., & Unveren, D. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and self-efficacy perception in reading comprehension in mother-tongue: Sample of 8th graders. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.83
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81).
Boyask, R., Jackson, J., Milne, J., Harrington, C., & May, R. (2024). We enjoy doing reading together: Finding potential in affective encounters with people and things for sustaining volitional reading. Language and Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2337658
Cai, Y., & Zhao, C. (2023). Metacognitive strategies and self-efficacy co-shape L2 achievement: A multilevel structural equation modeling approach. System, 117, 103099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103099
Clark, C., & Teravainen, A. (2017). What it means to be a reader at age 11: Valuing skills, affective components, and behavioral processes, An outline of the evidence. National Literacy Trust. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad296
Dadandı, P. U., & Dadandı, İ. (2022). The relationships among teachers’ behaviors that encourage students’ reading engagement, reading enjoyment, reading self-efficacy, and reading success. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.56.9.3
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq023
Ebrahimi, S. S., & Jiar, Y. K. (2018). IRANIAN STUDENTS'PERCEPTIONS ON POETRY READING STRATEGIES. European Journal of Education Studies. http://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1592
Ebrahimi, S. S., & Zainal, S. (2018). Actual poetry reading strategies by English as a foreign language learner. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(6), 953-975. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/7299
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and metacognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.34.10.906
Gajria, M., & Jitendra, A. K. (2016). Effective strategies for developing reading comprehension. In Interventions in learning disabilities: A handbook on systematic training programs for individuals with learning disabilities (pp. 119-137). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31235-4_8
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.2.331
Ghaith, G., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66748
Juhkam, M., Jõgi, A. L., Soodla, P., & Aro, M. (2023). Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1191103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103
Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
Immink, A. M. (2023). The effect of modeling metacognitive strategies using explicit direct instruction on fourth-grade students’ metacognitive awareness and reading comprehension achievement (Master's thesis, University of Twente). http://essay.utwente.nl/94443/
Kim, H., Kim, E. J., & Han, S. J. (2025). Can metacognitive reading strategies be promoted by motivational factors among high school students in South Korea? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00991-1
Klimova, B., Zamborova, K., & Fronckova, K. (2024). Metacognitive Reading Awareness Among Freshmen EFL Students. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 35(2), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-35-2-65-81
Kolb, C. L. (2014). Relationships between discourse, reader identity, and reading self-efficacy in a high school English classroom: A mixed-methods, critical ethnographic study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). https://search.proquest.com/openview/ef83af9c59d5b87e3d3b116996f381af/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Koşar, G., Akbana, Y. E., & Yakar, L. (2022). Development and validation of a reading self-efficacy scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.894688
Li, J. T., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H. (2024). The effects of four instructional strategies on English learners’ English reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994133
Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1720946
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219-246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
Mokhtari, L., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
Moritz, S., & Lysaker, P. H. (2018). Metacognition, what did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions. Schizophrenia Research, 201, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001
Naqvi, S., Srivastava, R., Al Damen, T., Al Aufi, A., Al Amri, A., & Al Adawi, S. (2023). Establishing reliability and validity of an online placement test in an Omani higher education institution. Languages, 8(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010061
Rezaee, A. A., & Salehi, M. (2009). The construct validity of a language proficiency test: A multitrait multimethod approach. Teaching English Language, 3(1), 93-110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283142261
Rogiers, A., Van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2020). The profile of the skilled reader: An investigation into the role of reading enjoyment and student characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101512
Shehzad, M. W., Lashari, S. A., Alghorbany, A., & Lashari, T. A. (2019). Self-efficacy sources and reading comprehension: The mediating role of reading self-efficacy beliefs. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2019-2503-07
Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students' self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading, and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 202-206.                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.010
Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognition in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Webber, C., Wilkinson, K., Duncan, L. G., & McGeown, S. (2024). Adolescents' perspectives on the barriers to reading for pleasure. Literacy, 58(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12359
Wei, D., Xu, C., & Zheng, X. (2025). Motivation and metacognitive strategy use in reading English as a foreign language among adolescent learners. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(3), 1091-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00923-5
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. New York.
Wistner, B., Sakai, H., & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan English Placement Test as L2 proficiency tests. Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Hosei University, 58(2), 33-44. https://www.academia.edu/download/36957728/Wistner__Sakai____Abe_2009_An_Analysis_of_the_Oxford_Placement_Test_and.pdf
Zarei, A. A. (2018). On the relationship between metacognitive reading strategies, reading self-efficacy, and L2 reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10(22), 157-181. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8342_1003.html?lang=fa
Zheng, R. (2023). An analysis of the current situation of Chinese university students' English reading self-efficacy and a proposed intervention program for enhancement. Pacific International. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v6i2.377
Zhou, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Developmental trajectories of and reciprocal relationships between Chinese university students' foreign language reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1512098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1512098
Journal of Studies in Language Learning and Teaching
Volume 2, Issue 2
July 2025
Pages 19-32

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 September 2025
  • Revise Date: 21 January 2026
  • Accept Date: 07 March 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics