The Effect of Praise for Effort versus Praise for Intelligence on the Learning of English Conditional Structures by Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of English language and literature, Faculty of foreign languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Over the past few decades, studies have gained considerable momentum on the concept of growth mindset, which has become one of the major factors in evaluating learner uptake of academic outcomes. This quantitative study examined how the incorporation of praise for intelligence and praise for effort affects young Iranian language students’ achievement of English conditional structures. For this purpose, a Quick Oxford Placement Test (QOPT) was administered to the target population of female learners learning English in a private language institution. From those at the lower intermediate proficiency level, three groups, 25 in each, were randomly selected and divided into one control group and two experimental groups, namely praise for effort and praise for intelligence. All the groups attended grammar lessons on English conditionals for twelve 75-minute evening sessions on alternate days of the week. Prior to the treatment, a pretest on grammar conditionals was applied to assess the learners’ entry behavior. After the treatment, a parallel form of the same test was given to gauge the efficacy of the intervention. The analysis of the obtained data revealed that the proper use of praise for effort and praise for intelligence could improve the learners’ competence in conditional structures compared to those in the no-treatment group. Notably, the results of the study may offer practical implications for how language teachers improve learners’ success in language grammar in general and English conditional structures in particular.

Keywords

References

Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (2008). Children’s implicit theories of intelligence: It’s relationships with self-efficacy, goal orientations, and self-regulated learning. The International Journal of Learning, 15(2), 47-56.
Akbar, R. & Al-Gharabally, N. (2020). Does praising intelligence improve achievements? An ESL case. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 279-289.
Akbari, J. & Chalak, A. (2019). The contributory role of praise in improving collocational knowledge of university students majoring in TEFL and linguistics. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 1-12
Axe, J. B. & Laprime, A. P. (2017). The effects of contingent pairing on establishing praise as a reinforcer with children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29(2), 325-340.
Bates, B. (2015). Bargaining for Life. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
Bear, G. G. (2010). School Discipline and Self-Discipline: A Practical Guide to Promoting Prosocial Student Behavior. Guilford Press.
Blackwell, C. W. (2015). Jacob Brucker's theory of knowledge and the history of natural philosophy. In W. Enfield (Ed.), Jacob Brucker (1696-1770), Augustan Colloquia, pp. 198-217, Akademie Verlag.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263
Boaler, J. (2013). Ability and mathematics: The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. FORUM, 55(1), 143-152.
Brummelman, E., Thomaes, S., Castro, B. O., Overbeek, G. & Bushman, B. J. (2014). That’s not just beautiful-that’s incredibly beautiful! The adverse impact of inflated praise on children with low self-esteem. Psychological Science, 25(3), 728-735.
Burnette, J. L., Russell, M. V., Hoyt, C. L., Orvidas, K. & Widman, L. (2018). An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 428-445.
Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 79(4), 474.
Chivers, T. (2017). A mindset “revolution” sweeping Britain’s classrooms may be based on shaky science. BuzzFeed News.
Cimpian, A., Arce, H. M. C., Markman, E. M. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science, 18(4), 314-316.
Copes, H. & Williams, J. P. (2007). Techniques of affirmation: Deviant behavior, moral commitment, and subcultural identity. Deviant behavior, 28(3), 247-272.
Costa, A. & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 829.
Coupland, N. & Jaworski, A. (2004). Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. In A. Jaworski et al. (eds.), Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, pp. 15-51, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dweck, C. S. (1998). The development of early self-conceptions: Their relevance for motivational processes. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span, pp. 257-280, Cambridge University Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2016). What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parent’s views of intelligence but their parent’s views of failure. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859-869.
Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Dweck, C. S. & Master, A. (2009). Self-theories and motivation: Students’ beliefs about intelligence. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school, pp. 123-140, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Ellis, R. (2008). Principles Of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Ferguson, M. (2013). Praise: What does the literature say? What are the implications for teachers?. Kairaranga, 14(2), 35-39.
Glerum, J., Loyens, S. & Rikers, R. (2019). Mind your mindset. An empirical study of mindset in secondary vocational education and training. Educational Studies, 46(3), 1-9.
Glerum, J., Loyens, S. M. & Rikers, R. M. (2020). Is an online mindset intervention effective in vocational education? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 821-830.
Gregory, G. H. & Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated Instructional Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Henderlong, J. & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 128(5), 774-789.
Hyland, K. (2019). 14 What messages do students take from teacher feedback?. In K. Hyland (Ed.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and issues, pp. 265-284.
Lang, J. M. (2016). Small Teaching. Everyday Lessons from The Science of Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Liamkina, O. & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar dilemma: teaching grammar as a resource for making meaning. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 270-289.
Mann, M. & Taylore-Knowles, S. (2008). Destination B1: Grammar & Vocabulary [with answer key]. Macmillan.
Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second Language Learning Theories. Second edition, London: Hodder Arnold.
Mueller, C. M. & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 33.
Ng, B. (2018). The neuroscience of growth mindset and intrinsic motivation. Brain sciences, 8(2), 20.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-119.
Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T. & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A class-wide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School psychology review, 37(3), 315-332.
Robins, G. (2012). Praise, Motivation and The Child. Routledge.
Saphier, J. & Gower, R. (1997). The Skillful Teacher: Building Your Teaching Skills. Carlisle, MA: Research for Better Teaching.
Shenk, D. (2010). The Genius in All of Us: New Insights into Genetics, Talent, and IQ.  Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L. & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549-571.
Skalecká, K. (2010). The Effective Use of Praise in Teaching Adults. University of Pardubice Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.
Tang, X., Wang, M. -T., Guo, J. & Salmela-Aro, K. (2019). Building grit: The longitudinal pathways between mindset, commitment, grit, and academic outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(5), 850-863.
Ulber, J., Hamann, K. & Tomasello, M. (2016). Extrinsic rewards diminish costly sharing in 3‐year‐olds. Child Development, 87(4), 1192-1203.
Yeager, D. & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When Students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314.
Yeager, D. S. & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269-1284.
Zarrinabadi, N. & Rahimi, S. (2021). The effects of praise for effort versus praise for intelligence on psychological aspects of L2 writing among English-majoring university students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(2), 156-167.
Zhao, L., Heyman, G. D., Chen, L. & Lee, K. (2017). Praising young children for being smart promotes cheating. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1868-1870.
Journal of Studies in Language Learning and Teaching
Volume 1, Issue 1
July 2023
Pages 77-92

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 February 2023
  • Revise Date: 28 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 26 May 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics