The Impact of the Formal Instruction of Invitation Speech Act on the Ostensible and Genuine Pragmatic Knowledge of Iranian EFL Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Author

TESL, Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Mazandaran, Iran

Abstract

The present study was an attempt to investigate the impact of formal instruction as a facilitative tool to develop the ostensible and genuine pragmatic knowledge of Iranian EFL learners with a focus on the “speech act of invitation”. The participants of this study were 60 females Iranian EFL learners at the intermediate level who were divided into two different groups, control and experimental. The all went through the Interchange series which resulted in having a similar background in learning English. The participants’ level was assessed with both a pretest and a posttest in order to be homogenized considering their pragmatic knowledge in advance. The results of this study showed that the formal instruction affected the participants by giving them a higher level of proficiency in pragmatic knowledge.  The findings of the study would be helpful for language teachers and curriculum developers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abbood, H. (2016). Investigating the Use of the Two Speech Acts of Invitation and Offer Among Iraqi EFL University Learners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Universi­ty Science Malaysia, USM, Malaysia.
Al-Khatib, M. A. (2006). The pragmatics of invitation mak­ing and acceptance in Jordanian society. Journal of Lan­guage and Linguistics, 5(2), 272-294.
Amelia, F. (2015). Speech acts of invitation in English. Journal of Speech Acts of Invitation in English6(1), 1-28.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Vol. 88, Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Pragmatic awareness and instructed L2 learning: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the AAAL 1997 Conference, Orlando.
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Po­liteness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press.
Bruder, M. N. & Tillitt, B. (1999). Speaking Naturally (12th printing). Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1985). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, L. (2007). Oxford Placement Test (Elementary to Intermediate). Oxford Press.
Eslami, R. Z. (2005). Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine? Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 453-480
Eslami-Rasekh, A. & Mardani, M. (2010). Investigating the effects of teaching apology speech act, with a focus on intensifying strategies, on pragmatic development of EFL learners: The Iranian context. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture30(1), 96-103.
Eslami, R. Z. & Koutlaki A. S. (2018). Critical intercultural communication education: cultural analysis and pedagogical applications. Journal of Intercultural Communication Education, 1(3), 100-109.
Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1990). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Interaction. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Green, G. M. (1996). Pragmatics and Natural Language Un­derstanding. Psychology Press.
Hancher, M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocu­tionary acts. Language in Society, 8(1), 1-14.
Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and Language Education. Cam­bridge University Press.
Isaacs, E. A. & Clark, H. H. (1990). Ostensible invitations. Language in Society, 19(4), 493-509.
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be thought. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I, Second.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness, or minding your P’s and Q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292-305.
Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of Pragmatics. Routledge.
LoCastro, V. (2013). Pragmatics for Language Educa­tors: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Routledge.
Paltridge, B. & Burton, J. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Gold Coast, Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Rakowicz, A. (2009). Ambiguous Invitations: The Interlan­guage Pragmatics of Polish English Language Learners. New York University.
Richard, J. C., Platt, J. & Platt, H. (2010). Dictionary of lan­guage teaching & applied linguistics. Essex: Longman, 4th edition, Longman: Pearson Education.
Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). A comparative sociopragmatic study of ostensible invitations in English and Farsi. Speech communication48(8), 903-912.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech Acts: An Essay in The Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in society, 5(1), 1-23.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cam­bridge University Press.
Shoshana, B. K., House, J. & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Grazer Linguistische Studien.
Sinclair, J. M. H. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1-22
Sukesti, L. A. (2014). Interlanguage pragmatics of invita­tion By Indonesian EFL learners. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Suraih, N. (2019). Invitation Strategies as Pro­duced by Yemeni EFL Learners. Applied Linguistics Re­search Journal, 3(2), 15-34.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Van Trong, N. G. U. Y. E. N. (2017). A comparative study on invitations in English and Vietnamese in terms of cross-cultural perspective. Doctoral dissertation, MA thesis. Dong Thap University, Luanvan.
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Newbury House Publishers.
Yaqubi, M., Rahman, W. R. E. A., & Hadavandkhani, A. (2019). Context in distinguishing between overt and actual functions of polite speech acts. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics7(1), 95-115.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.